Friday, November 9, 2018

It’s Time for Justice to be Served

Memo

To: President Trump
From: The Forgotten Men and Women in America

Re: Rebuilding our Faith in the Rule of Law

Dear Mr. President,

Thank you for everything that you have done to make America great again!

The tax and regulatory policies that you have enacted since January 2017 have magically (at least according to President Obama’s “wand” theory)  improved the American economy to a degree that was unthinkable. (see Nobel Laureate & New York Times Expert Paul Krugman for example)

Your willingness to confront global threats such as North Korea, Iran and Russia is a welcome change from your predecessor whose lead from behind “strategy” and apology tour promoted chaos which inevitably threatened the safety of the civilized world. Rather than repeatedly drawing red lines or ignoring conflict, it is clear that frank negotiations unwilling to compromise on American safety together with military strength are the only reasonable means of deterrence as Ronald Reagan understood during the Cold War. A decision not to engage is a decision to accept the consequences of bad actors with bad intentions. We are blessed to have an American President who recognizes that one of his sacred obligations is to “preserve, protect and defend” our nation.

The resurgence in American patriotism is absolutely attributable to you.  Your commitment to a policy of America first (American Nationalism), to strengthening our military, to treating our veterans with respect, to honoring first responders, to demanding respect for our national anthem demonstrate a love of America that the 44th President of the United States was unable or unwilling to express with the nation. When Lee Greenwood sings God bless the USA at your rallies, the electricity in the crowd is remarkable.  Your love of America is sincere and genuine. As a fellow American, I am proud that my President loves our country and has dedicated his life to returning it to the founding principles that enabled greatness.

Given your recent history of making and fulfilling promises, a revolutionary concept in modern politics, I fully expect that you will address immigration, fair trade and health care, and if the opportunity presents itself, nominate another conservative justice for the Supreme Court.

On behalf of my fellow forgotten American men and women, I implore you to add one more significant task to your list of priorities between now and the election of 2020:

Restore American confidence in our system of justice.  For too long, we have watched as Leftist politicians and Washington bureaucrats have deliberately violated both the letter and spirit of our laws. They have done so with an arrogance and contempt for the forgotten man that cannot be ignored.  They have done so because they believe that they are above the law and will not be held responsible for their actions. Worse, they have effectively turned various governmental agencies into tyrannical weapons in pursuit of their political agenda.

These criminals MUST be held accountable for their crimes.  Justice must be served. If America is to continue to serve as the world’s last best hope for freedom and liberty, if the American dream is to survive, if Americans are to maintain confidence in the ideals and aspirations of a Constitutional republic, justice must prevail.  

What if the forgotten man, like the submariner who spent a year in jail for taking a picture in a submarine, concludes that there are two separate systems of justice? Can a constitutional republic survive if the people lose faith in the system? Can a constitutional republic survive without virtue and integrity? Skepticism and cynicism are inevitable when a double standard exists. Civic virtue is a must for freedom, liberty and justice to survive.

The Department of Justice, now led by Matthew Whitaker, must expose, try and punish those responsible for perpetrating a series of crimes that taken together represent the greatest threat to our nation since the Civil War. As with the southern Democrats in 1861, these individuals have acted (alone and in some cases conspired) with complete disregard for the Constitution.

These individuals include the following:
  • Barack Obama - the man who weaponized the IRS, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA.  He authorized a spying operation on American citizens for political purposes including the unmasking of more than 2,000 people. He was complicit in the transmission of top secret documents through an unauthorized server courtesy of his Secretary of State. He instructed his Department of Justice to ignore multiple crimes in order to protect his administration, his political party, his legacy;
  • John Brennan - former CIA head who orchestrated the setup and spying on American citizens as well as the unmasking of Americans, conspired with UK/Australian and other intelligence officials to deliberately bypass normal intelligence channels, gather information to be used against a political opponent;
  • Hillary Clinton - former Secretary of State & Presidential candidate who violated multiple laws regarding the handling of top secret material,  destroyed emails under subpoena, contributed to the death of multiple CIA agents, sold out American interests with Uranium One, operated a fraud foundation whose primary purpose was to shake down foreign governments in exchange for cash and favors, funded the use of a dossier and actively disseminated its contents to the national media in order to falsely claim that the newly elected President was victorious because of Russian “collusion”;
  • Jim Clapper - former NIC responsible for conspiring with Brennan in an illegal spying operation for political purposes and lying to Congress under oath;
  • Eric Holder - the only AG in the history of the United States ever held in contempt by congress, who has never been held to account for the Fast and Furious Operation that led to the death of American law enforcement agents;
  • James Comey - The FBI, under Comey’s direction, conducted covert, renegade surveillance of American citizens in full violation of the fourth amendment, he signed FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign without verifying that the required evidence of probable cause was, in fact, truthful and legitimate.
  • Andrew McCabe - former #2 man at the FBI, now ex-FBI agent under investigation for his actions related to the Clinton and Trump investigations, lied regarding his recusal on the Clinton email scandal while his wife received a significant financial gift/political contribution from a Clinton associate.

  • Peter Strozk - Ex-FBI agent who failed to pursue criminal claims against HRC in order to protect her political objectives while at the same time demonstrated extraordinary personal bias against the President and recklessly pursued counter-intelligence claims against Donald Trump that violated department standards and compromised the investigation.  
If these (and other) individuals are held responsible for their actions, it will demonstrate to the forgotten men and women of the United States that Washington DC is NOT out of control, that no man is above the law, that the rule of law still exists, that the government cannot be used as a weapon against citizens to achieve political ends.  As it stands today, Americans have serious doubts about the integrity of the DOJ and the FBI based upon the events of recent years. Turning the immense power of the federal investigative agencies against individuals without reasonable or probable cause for political purposes is unprecedented in American history.

If the precedent is set that there is no penalty for gross violations of the Constitution or attempting to overthrow a duly elected President by illegal means, then it will be tried again when the party in power decides that it cannot risk the loss of power in an election. What would happen if the peaceful transfer of power between political parties after an election is put at risk? (see Florida, Arizona & Georgia)

When Hillary responds “what does it matter”, it is the obligation of the Department of Justice to insist that it has a sacred duty to protect the citizens of the United States, to ensure that Constitution is upheld and that the rule of law is applied to everyone equally and fairly.  It is ruinous to our nation to allow the perception that anyone can act without regard for consequences.

It’s time for justice to be served.  If not now, when? The House Democrats have already announced their intention to focus the next two years on sham investigations, all of which are designed to hound the President to such a degree that he is rendered politically impotent by their tactics.  Reports that the President is considering declassifying all materials related to the Russian investigation would short circuit the Democrat plan to pursue the issue of Russian collusion. If this declassification process were matched by a coordinated Department of Justice investigation into any and all of the crimes that I have referenced, it would put the Democrats on the defensive and enable President Trump to declare, rightfully, that the Mueller investigation was based on a lie that can be traced to most if not all of the individuals referenced in this essay.

I fully expect that the Left (current Democratic Party leadership) will attempt to claim that the Department of Justice investigations into any/all of the people listed in this essay are cynical acts of revenge/political punishment ordered by the President.  Of course they never expected to be in this position because they fully expected Hillary to be President. None of this would have seen the light of day under a Democratic administration. In fact, I believe that the HRC administration would have attempted to prosecute Donald Trump after the election in order to send a message that opposition would be futile and that like a mob boss, the punishment would be exponential to ensure that no future opposition would be attempted.

The Left has zero credibility when it comes to the moral high ground. They only respect raw political power. If they have it, they wield their authority with righteous anger and apply it without concern for collateral damage.  If they have an lost an election, they will do anything to regain power, including (in this case) attempting to overthrow a legitimately elected President. They have done everything imaginable, together with their communication wing known as the mainstream media, to delegitimize and demonize the 45th President of the White House.  

The Mainstream Media will be forced to cover DOJ indictments, investigations and trials.  They will no doubt defend the perpetrators at all costs, but trials have an amazing way of persuading voters by evidence.  The MSM has conducted an offensive operation against Donald Trump and have resolutely refused to publicize allegations against these American traitors.  A decision by the Department of Justice to move forward and prosecute would place them in the impossible position of ignoring a major story.

Most Detroiters never believed that former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick would ever be held to account by his peers in a criminal trial, but the weight of evidence was so compelling (and embarrassing) that not only did Kwame receive multiple guilty verdicts and a lengthy sentence, polls afterwards showed that his political career was dead and his legacy demolished by the incontrovertible fact that he was a thief and a thug.  Everyone associated with the city of Detroit believed that the city was hopelessly corrupt UNTIL justice was finally delivered. Together with the bankruptcy process, the former mayor’s conviction has enabled the city to make substantial progress in just a few years because people finally had faith and confidence that city government was no longer corrupt.

Perhaps Carl Bernstein will finally be persuaded that the Democrats were responsible for a series of crimes that make Watergate look like child’s play by comparison...and if not, I have faith in the majority of American people that they will be able to decide, once the evidence is made public, that Obama, Hillary and the rest are guilty of historically unprecedented crimes that must NEVER be allowed to be repeated by anyone. As Mark Twain wrote, facts are stubborn things.  

It’s time for justice.  The wheels of justice have ground slowly.  Will they grind surely?

   

Friday, June 21, 2013

Ben Bloom 2 Sigma Challenge

Daphne Koller
Stanford University
MOOC
Coursera (Stanford, Harvard, MIT, Berkley)

What have Online courses taught us?
Daphne Koller TED speech regarding ONLINE courses

Sixteen Minute Mark:
discusses the power of customization/personalization
Identifies Ben Bloom's 1984 study regarding
lecture method compared with mastery method compared with individual tutoring method
2 sigma benefit - 98% of students receiving an above average education

How does a world in which electronic devices proliferate in the form of hybrid/online/customized/mastery approach enable a school to achieve the 2 sigma rate of success?

Online Education PBS story - how is online learning changing traditional learning

In 1980, if you wanted to know the weather, you waited for the 6pm or 11pm news. 
In 2013, the Weather Channel and weather apps provided 24/7 access to weather information.
In 1980, if you wanted to know the score of last night's game, you waited for the 6pm or 11pm news.
in 2013, ESPN has multiple television, radio and online apps to provide the information 24/7.

In 1980, if you wanted to study the quadratic equation, a math teacher covered that topic during the third week of the second month for 45 minutes each day.
In 2013, if you want to study the quadratic equation, you can go online for a video lecture on the subject 24/7 and take interactive practice tests to assess your mastery of the material 24/7.  
Educational Productivity has evolved to 

Educational Model: 25 students with one teacher for 45 minutes 180 days a year = your opportunity to learn.  Monday - Friday at 10am.
Teacher insists on the value of attending and participating daily as necessary to learn and make progress, but the learning process requires

What is the value of the instructor?
  • guide
  • mentor
  • facilitator
  • inspirer
  • motivator
  • leads the process of learning as a structured activity
  • establishing high expectations
  • challenging & affirming
  • Promote collaboration, problem solving, creativity, communication by students
  • Catholic schools - role model, promotion of key values/virtues such as integrity, character, excellence, perseverance, faith, kindness
 What is the importance of learning together with other students?
  • collaboration
  • socialization
  • raised expectations
  • positive "tidal wave" effect
  • collective value of work ethic
 What is the importance of class size?
  • improved personalization
  • customization
  • one on one time with a teacher
  • maximize adult-student interaction

What is the value of meeting at a set time on a daily basis?
  • structure
  • organization
  • habit

Challenge: 
How does a school improve its productivity by creating the 2 sigma solution with a greater than 25 to 1 student-teacher ratio? How does a school bring to bear the benefits of online/hybrid learning without losing the benefit/value of great teachers leading the learning?

Will education look the same in 10 or 20 years?
Is the status quo going to survive?
Can the status quo survive given the economic consequences of our instructional model?
Who is going to "invent" the new model without a bleeding edge impact on students?
What are the best practices of our current instructional system?
What will be the impact on other schools?
What if tuition costs could be cut in half due to efficiencies/productivities not currently being realized by the industrial model of 180 days, 45 minutes per period, 25 students per teacher?

Monday, April 1, 2013

BYOD BYOT

A very interesting forum on BYOD / BYOT from Education Week

Here is the hyperlink to the site:
http://www.edweek.org/ew/events/chats/2013/02/15/index.html

Here are my excerpts:



  • The question of equity in bring your own device programs always comes up when BYOD is mentioned.
  • The goal of the district should be an infrastructure that supports any device. We supply devices at school to those without.
  • We realize that not every student has a device, and we have implemented a BYOT Equity Task Force to learn more about the issue. We have noticed that students without devices have greater access to school resources when students with their own devices begin bringing theirs to school. We are working with our community to provide more online access
  • I would not suggest requiring the same device. That is not the world. Computing and eLearning has become a very personal activity. Some students prefer smaller devices, such as smart phones, some tablets, and some laptops. Our goal is anytime, anywhere, any device.
  • we focus on the instruction in the classroom and not so much on the technology. We encourage the students to bring in their own devices to class and teachers and students work together to learn new ways to research and show what they've learned.
  • we encourage smart phone use because that is how most of our students are accessing information and communicating. I agree with Tim. it is all about collaboration to make each learning experience unique.
  • smartphones are used for student response (We use an app called Socrative); research; creating projects; taking pictures; maintaining a calendar; taking notes; etc. If students need to use a laptop in the classroom, they use the schools or collaborate with a peer.
  • Here is a link to information about our BYOT Policy http://www.forsyth.k12.ga.us/byotpolicy. We are moving from an Acceptable Use Policy to a Responsible Use Procedure. We want online safety to be taught in the context of the day-to-day learning.
  • if students are using devices for their own learning, they tend to follow rules since not doing so may lead to losing access.
  • High expectations for technology use are essential to building a classroom community that supports BYOT.
  • We have an eLearning Director.
  • Instead of putting all of our resources into purchasing devices, we instead built an infrastructure to support our tech needs. We increased bandwidth and access points to create a wireless campus.
  • The expectations for how and when students use their technology is up to the teacher in that classroom community and school. Many teachers begin BYOT trying to manage devices but gradually begin to give up more control to students. An ear bud in one ear is often OK to many teachers depending on the task at hand.
  • I think the shift is that the teachers are not teaching to tech or teaching to apps. Our goal is to focus on more inquiry-based learning. Change the standard into a question. Have the students work together to research possible answers and create something to show what they have learned.
  • We do not purchase textbooks unless we also have an online option, Mike. Our expenditure on textbooks is dramatically less than it was before BYOT.

Monday, January 7, 2013

Presentations on 21st Century Learning

PowerPoint presentations from Loyola Catholic Schools Department



http://www.luc.edu/ccse/pdfs/Fort_Worth_21st_Century_Catholic_Schools1.pdf


http://www.luc.edu/ccse/pdfs/Digital_Learners_NCEA_11_PDF_1.pdf

Project Based Learning

Course Smart Technology on reading.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/technology/coursesmart-e-textbooks-track-students-progress-for-teachers.html?ref=education&_r=0





Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Disruptive Innovation in Education

Disruptive Innovation in Education: 

How would the marketplace (parents & students) respond if a school could demonstrate that a unique combination of culture and instructional methodology significantly improved student achievement, performance, and experience?

  • Disruptive Innovation -  An innovation that improves a product or service in ways that the market does not esxpect, typically first by designing for a different set of consumers in the new market and later by lowering prices in the existing market.
  • Sustaining Innovation - evolves existing products or services with better value, allowing the firms within to compete against each other's sustaining improvements.  These innovations can be transformational or revolutionary or evolutionary.
  • Disruptive innovations change entire markets.
  • Disruptive technology represents both opportunities and threats.
  • Good schools are usually aware of innovation, but their internal environment does not allow them to pursue these innovations with they first arise for various reasons.  
  • Existing businesses are often reluctant to take advantage of disruptive innovations since it would involved competing with their existing approach. Often established businesses will flee "upmarket" trying to make up the revenues and margins lost to the disruption rising from below.  They often eventually fail. 

Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave 1995 by Clayton Christensen & Joseph Bower.

Example of disruptive innovation - Floppy Disk Drive Market
1981 8" floppy disk drives used in mini computers replaced by 5.25" disks for desktop computers, then replaced by 3.5" floppy drives, then replaced by zip drives, CD's, USB flash drives, now cloud computing.
 
Educational examples of disruptive technology:
textbooks, paperbacks vs. E-Books
Xerox copies vs. electronic files (pdf)
notebook paper vs. online notes/Powerpoint

The Academic Visioning Committee has been formed as a logical outgrowth from the Strategic Planning process.  The committee’s objectives are:
  • Identify innovative & strategic opportunities regarding the academic future of the institution
  • Collaborate with stakeholders
  • Promote creative thinking
  • Set the standard rather than wait and see, be a leader not a follower
  • Accept the reality that the future is going to change given the tools available to teachers and learners
Mission Fundamentals - Must be retained
  •  Commitment to academic excellence &  rigorous curriculum
  •  Focus on student achievement & development of work ethic
  • Prepares students for collegiate & professional success
  • Institutional commitment to the Essential Elements
    • Pursues excellence in all its endeavors
    • Celebrates the value and dignity of each person 
    • Nurtures the development of the whole person
    • Proclaims and witnesses to its Catholic identity
    • Evangelizes youth within the mission of the Church
    • Fosters and invigorates a community of faith 
  • Teacher as value-added : more than presentation of information & knowledge 
      • Faith and character formation 
      • Challenging and affirming 
      • Interactive 
      • Inspires students to achieve beyond their expectations
  • Characteristics of a professional educator at Brother Rice High School
    • 1.       Commitment to the mission of Catholic education
      2.       Willingness to serve as a Christian role model
      3.       Loves students unconditionally
      4.       Works in the best interests of the students
      5.       Respects the dignity of every student
      6.       Is optimistic about students and their future
      7.       Maintains high expectations within a rigorous curriculum
      8.       Challenges students to  achieve excellence in everything they do
      9.       Teaches students to be accountable
      10.     Is affirming and encouraging
      11.     Is passionate and enthusiastic
      12.     Communicates effectively
      13.     Is a lifelong learner
      14.     Is willing to innovate for the benefit of student achievement
      15.     Demonstrates professional competency in their subject matter
Old School - Discontinued
  • Primary methodology is teachers talk, students listen 
  • Teacher is active, student is passive
  •  Location impacts resource availability
  •  Learning defined by knowledge & comprehension, memorization
  •  Minimal interactivity
  •  Paper and pen/pencil based
  •  Resources scarce
  • Confrontational discipline
  • Minimal technology 

New School - Must be added 
  •   21st century Learning & Instruction: Critical Thinking, Creativity, Collaboration
  •  Integration of technology (communication & computing) into the learning experience
    • Regularly utilizes the Internet to communicate student information: Grades, homework, schedule, etc. 
    • Promotes the use of technology for asynchronous learning – Research, Writing, Online practice tests, video & podcast lectures, etc.

    • Supports the transition to digital books & resources 
    • Dramatically reduces the use of paper and significantly increases the use of electronic resources (i.e. pdf files)
  •  Adoption of 21st century learning & instructional methodology
    • Daily class activities are designed to be engaging and interactive. A teacher-centered learning environment in which lecture is the primary methodology is no longer acceptable.
    • Seeks professional development opportunities to enhance their understanding of 21 st century learning techniques
       

1Micro – What is the 21st century model of instruction?

·         21st century attributes:
o   Collaboration
o   Critical thinking
o   Creation
o   Communication
o   Computer integration

  •  Will a new model of instruction improve student achievement, increase student motivation, promote higher enrollment, be leading or bleeding edge?
  •  What are the essential methodologies that a professional 21st century educator dedicated to excellence and student achievement should utilize on a day to day basis?
  •  Will the combination of a professional instructor who is a role model in matters of character and faith be the primary value-added role of the teacher, or will the teacher’s role change?

·         One idea – the “Flipped” classroom

o   Pre-Class:

  • Teacher presentation of information available online
  • Student readings available online or electronically
  • Interactive practice tests available online

o   Class

  •   Interactive
  • Engaged
  • Activity-based
  • Problem-solving
  • Critical thinking
  • Collaborative
  • Creative

o   Post-Class
  •  Communication
  •  Blogging
  • Emails
  • Research
  • Pace supplement
  • Video
  • Reading
  • Online practice
  • Peer support/tutoring
o   Assessment
  • Testing for mastery
  • Individual or collective achievement of learning objectives (pace).      

Macro – what will the school of the future look like?

  • Online or hybrid?
  • One to one with technology?
  • 45 minutes daily on each subject or?
  • Only “time” for six or seven courses?
  • Master teacher for everyone in one subject with teachers for daily meetings?
  • Will everyone be on the same pace? Will a semester define the awarding of a credit, or will the demonstration of mastery earn credits?
  • Will 24 credits be the minimum after four years?
  •  Will the future financial model represent the same basics of the current era - 80% of cost is labor, 22-1 student teacher ratio.
  • How will the school of the future deliver instructional excellence to its students?
o   Will class sizes increase or decrease?
  • The primary driver of our business/financial model is teacher-student ratio.  If we adopt the college model of a 250 person lecture class, I am certain that we could drive our costs down and pay fewer teachers much better,  but I am not convinced that such an impersonal setting would benefit any of our students.  Nevertheless, are there ways for us to improve our “productivity” and reduce costs given the tools that are available? 
o   Will a teacher’s full-time job responsibilities remain the same in the future?  Will five classes of roughly 22 students constitute the primary learning entity in the school, or are there alternatives?  Could we have a master teacher produce learning sessions for larger class sizes and have smaller work/discussion groups with teacher aides similar to the college model?  Every study indicates that the most important element in secondary education is the adult leading the learning in the classroom – how do we enhance or promote this going forward? 
  
  • Imagine the following “flipped classroom” scenario – what if every lecture/presentation by the teacher was available on video and that daily “homework” was reading and watching the videos at home while the class sessions were dedicated to interactive activities in which problem-solving, critical thinking, collaborative opportunities for creation and communication on computing devices – is there a way that this could be done to alter the current five periods a day of 22 kids full-time assignment that would improve learning or assessment?  One of the challenges of proper assessment is that if you don’t know your students, how do you properly assess them, especially if higher order thinking is included in the process?
o   Will the school year be longer or shorter? What about the school day?  Will a student attend 6-7 classes with 22 other students every day where a teacher is leading the class, or will there be an alternative/hybrid that produces higher student achievement and changes the current business model of instruction?
o   Would we offer online classes of shorter duration during the year or perhaps during the summer to supplement learning or push everyone into calculus by their senior year or to enable students to move on to college faster?
o   Will one teacher or a team of teachers instruct students in an individual subject?
o   Will the class be held daily in a particular location or online or both?
o   Will the mastery of the material at an individual pace take precedence or replace the current “collective pace” that places students on a four year, 24 credit track regardless of the speed with which they learn?
o   Will the social aspect of learning remain an essential aspect of the secondary learning process?  
o   Can a faith-based institution adjust the 22-1 ratio of teacher to student upwards without losing the benefit of our unique value add?
o   Can we afford to wait and watch, or is it imperative that we think and plan and act accordingly?
§  What are the risks of being on the “bleeding edge”?

Whatever path we choose, will we do so collectively as a conscious choice or will we continue to point ourselves in a collective direction but allow our individual faculty members the individual and daily choices that have historically defined the educational process?  Do we need the pioneers to guide the rest of us, or do we consciously and deliberately make a school-wide choice and “bet the farm” on an approach that is on the leading edge?